Comparisons / Agno vs LangGraph
Agno vs LangGraph: Which Agent Framework to Use?
Agno vs LangGraph, head to head
Agno and LangGraph both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
Agno (formerly Phidata) is a lightweight Python framework for building agents.
LangGraph is LangChain's stateful workflow framework — a graph of nodes (functions) connected by edges with shared state.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick Agno if
Pick Agno if agno adds value when you want a batteries-included agent with minimal boilerplate — especially for multi-modal agents or team orchestration. But each of its abstractions maps to a small piece of plain Python. If your agent is straightforward, writing it directly gives you full control with zero framework overhead. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; LangGraph will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick LangGraph if
Pick LangGraph if langGraph earns its weight when your agent is a workflow — explicit branches, checkpoints, parallel branches, or a human approval gate. For a single-agent loop, the graph machinery is overkill and a plain while loop is faster to write, debug, and ship. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Agno will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
Agno
39.2k
5.2k
Python
Apache-2.0
2022-05-04
Agno (formerly Phidata)
LangGraph
18.9k
3.4k
Python
MIT
2024-01-17
LangChain Inc (Harrison Chase)
Sequoia Capital, Benchmark
Part of LangChain Inc — $50M raised across A and B
8.2M
LangGraph Platform (hosted), LangSmith (observability)
Yes
Used by: Replit, Klarna, Elastic
github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph→GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | Agno | LangGraph |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | `Agent(model=OpenAIChat(), instructions=[...])` class with `run()` method | A `StateGraph` with nodes, edges, and a typed `State` channel |
| Tools | Function tools via `@tool` decorator or built-in toolkits (web search, SQL, etc.) | `ToolNode(tools)` paired with a conditional edge for routing |
| Agent Loop | `Agent.run()` handles tool dispatch internally, configurable via `show_tool_calls` | — |
| Memory / Knowledge | Knowledge bases (PDF, URL, vector DB) injected via `knowledge` param + built-in memory | — |
| Multi-Agent (Teams) | `Team` class with `agents` list, `mode` (sequential, parallel, coordinate), and shared memory | — |
| Storage | `SqlAgentStorage`, `PostgresAgentStorage` for persisting sessions and state | — |
| Loop | — | `add_conditional_edges` from a node back to itself until a `END` condition |
| State | — | Typed `State` channels with reducers (`Annotated[list, add_messages]`) |
| Checkpointing | — | `MemorySaver` / `PostgresSaver` persists state per `thread_id` |
| Human-in-loop | — | `interrupt_before` / `interrupt_after` pauses execution for review |
| Parallel fanout | — | Multiple edges from one node + reducers merge results |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both Agno and LangGraph implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →