Comparisons / Agno vs LlamaIndex
Agno vs LlamaIndex: Which Agent Framework to Use?
Agno vs LlamaIndex, head to head
Agno and LlamaIndex both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
Agno (formerly Phidata) is a lightweight Python framework for building agents.
LlamaIndex started as a RAG framework — connect your data, query it with an LLM.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick Agno if
Pick Agno if agno adds value when you want a batteries-included agent with minimal boilerplate — especially for multi-modal agents or team orchestration. But each of its abstractions maps to a small piece of plain Python. If your agent is straightforward, writing it directly gives you full control with zero framework overhead. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; LlamaIndex will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick LlamaIndex if
Pick LlamaIndex if llamaIndex adds genuine value when your agent needs to query structured or unstructured data as part of its reasoning — that's the index-as-tool pattern, and it's well-executed. But if you're building a general-purpose agent that doesn't need RAG, the agent framework is overhead. The plain Python version of the agent loop is the same 60 lines either way. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Agno will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
Agno
39.2k
5.2k
Python
Apache-2.0
2022-05-04
Agno (formerly Phidata)
LlamaIndex
48.3k
7.2k
Python
MIT
2022-11-02
Jerry Liu
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | Agno | LlamaIndex |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | `Agent(model=OpenAIChat(), instructions=[...])` class with `run()` method | `AgentRunner` with `AgentWorker`, or `ReActAgent` for tool-calling agents |
| Tools | Function tools via `@tool` decorator or built-in toolkits (web search, SQL, etc.) | `FunctionTool` for custom tools, `QueryEngineTool` to query an index as a tool |
| Agent Loop | `Agent.run()` handles tool dispatch internally, configurable via `show_tool_calls` | `AgentRunner.chat()` manages step-by-step execution via `AgentWorker` tasks |
| Memory / Knowledge | Knowledge bases (PDF, URL, vector DB) injected via `knowledge` param + built-in memory | — |
| Multi-Agent (Teams) | `Team` class with `agents` list, `mode` (sequential, parallel, coordinate), and shared memory | — |
| Storage | `SqlAgentStorage`, `PostgresAgentStorage` for persisting sessions and state | — |
| RAG Integration | — | `VectorStoreIndex` + `QueryEngineTool` — the agent can query your data as a tool call |
| Memory | — | `ChatMemoryBuffer` with token limit, or custom memory modules |
| Orchestration | — | `AgentRunner` step API for custom control flow, or multi-agent pipelines |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both Agno and LlamaIndex implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →