Comparisons / Agno vs OpenAI Agents SDK
Agno vs OpenAI Agents SDK: Which Agent Framework to Use?
Agno vs OpenAI Agents SDK, head to head
Agno and OpenAI Agents SDK both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
Agno (formerly Phidata) is a lightweight Python framework for building agents.
OpenAI's Agents SDK (evolved from Swarm) provides Agent, Runner, handoffs, and guardrails.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick Agno if
Pick Agno if agno adds value when you want a batteries-included agent with minimal boilerplate — especially for multi-modal agents or team orchestration. But each of its abstractions maps to a small piece of plain Python. If your agent is straightforward, writing it directly gives you full control with zero framework overhead. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; OpenAI Agents SDK will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick OpenAI Agents SDK if
Pick OpenAI Agents SDK if the Agents SDK is the thinnest framework on this list — it barely abstracts beyond what you'd write yourself. Use it when you want OpenAI's conventions and auto-schema generation. Skip it when you want full control or use non-OpenAI models. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Agno will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
Agno
39.2k
5.2k
Python
Apache-2.0
2022-05-04
Agno (formerly Phidata)
OpenAI Agents SDK
20.6k
3.4k
Python
MIT
2025-03-11
OpenAI
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | Agno | OpenAI Agents SDK |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | `Agent(model=OpenAIChat(), instructions=[...])` class with `run()` method | `Agent(name, instructions, model, tools)` |
| Tools | Function tools via `@tool` decorator or built-in toolkits (web search, SQL, etc.) | Python functions with type hints, auto-converted to schemas |
| Agent Loop | `Agent.run()` handles tool dispatch internally, configurable via `show_tool_calls` | `Runner.run()` handles the loop internally |
| Memory / Knowledge | Knowledge bases (PDF, URL, vector DB) injected via `knowledge` param + built-in memory | — |
| Multi-Agent (Teams) | `Team` class with `agents` list, `mode` (sequential, parallel, coordinate), and shared memory | — |
| Storage | `SqlAgentStorage`, `PostgresAgentStorage` for persisting sessions and state | — |
| Handoffs | — | `Handoff` between `Agent` objects for multi-agent routing |
| Guardrails | — | `InputGuardrail` and `OutputGuardrail` with tripwire pattern |
| Context | — | Typed context object passed through the agent lifecycle |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both Agno and OpenAI Agents SDK implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →