Comparisons / Anthropic Agent SDK vs AWS Bedrock AgentCore
Anthropic Agent SDK vs AWS Bedrock AgentCore: Which Agent Framework to Use?
Anthropic Agent SDK vs AWS Bedrock AgentCore, head to head
Anthropic Agent SDK and AWS Bedrock AgentCore both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
The Anthropic Agent SDK packages Claude Code's agent loop as a library.
Bedrock AgentCore is AWS's managed runtime for production agents, launched in July 2025.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick Anthropic Agent SDK if
Pick Anthropic Agent SDK if the Anthropic Agent SDK's real value is packaging Claude Code's battle-tested agent loop with built-in tools and MCP integration. If you want a production agent that reads files, runs commands, and connects to services, it saves significant plumbing. For understanding how agents work, the plain version is more instructive. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; AWS Bedrock AgentCore will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick AWS Bedrock AgentCore if
Pick AWS Bedrock AgentCore if agentCore is for production AWS deployments where you want to skip the runtime, memory, identity, and observability work and pay AWS to do it instead. It is framework-agnostic — bring Strands, LangGraph, CrewAI, or your own. For non-AWS teams, prototypes, or anything where you want to see what the agent is doing, plain Python on Lambda or a container is simpler. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Anthropic Agent SDK will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
Anthropic Agent SDK
3.1k
582
Python
MIT
2023-01-17
Anthropic
Google, Spark Capital
Yes
AWS Bedrock AgentCore
Managed service
Proprietary (AWS)
2025-07-16
AWS
Amazon Web Services
AgentCore Runtime, Memory, Identity, Gateway, Observability — pay-as-you-go on AWS
Yes
Used by: AWS internal teams, Amazon Q Developer
github.com/(closed-source SaaS — see strands-agents/* on GitHub for the SDK side)→GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | Anthropic Agent SDK | AWS Bedrock AgentCore |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | Claude agent with built-in tools, MCP servers, and system prompt | — |
| Tools | Built-in tools (`bash`, file read/write, web) + MCP server connections | — |
| Agent Loop | SDK's internal agentic loop with automatic tool dispatch | — |
| Sub-Agents | Agents invoke other agents as tools via the SDK | — |
| Lifecycle Hooks | 18 hook events: pre/post tool call, message, error, etc. | — |
| MCP Integration | One-line MCP server config for Playwright, Slack, GitHub, etc. | — |
| Runtime | — | Sandboxed, low-latency container per session, up to 8h, MicroVM-isolated |
| Memory | — | Managed short-term + long-term memory with semantic recall and namespacing |
| Identity | — | OAuth flows, AWS IAM, Secrets Manager integration, per-user credential vending |
| Gateway | — | Turn any API or Lambda into an MCP-compliant tool with one config |
| Observability | — | OpenTelemetry traces, per-step LLM call costs, error grouping in CloudWatch |
| Browser | — | Managed isolated browser tool for agent web actions |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both Anthropic Agent SDK and AWS Bedrock AgentCore implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →