Comparisons / Anthropic Agent SDK vs AWS Strands Agents
Anthropic Agent SDK vs AWS Strands Agents: Which Agent Framework to Use?
Anthropic Agent SDK vs AWS Strands Agents, head to head
Anthropic Agent SDK and AWS Strands Agents both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
The Anthropic Agent SDK packages Claude Code's agent loop as a library.
AWS Strands Agents is a lightweight, model-driven Python SDK for building agents released by AWS in May 2025.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick Anthropic Agent SDK if
Pick Anthropic Agent SDK if the Anthropic Agent SDK's real value is packaging Claude Code's battle-tested agent loop with built-in tools and MCP integration. If you want a production agent that reads files, runs commands, and connects to services, it saves significant plumbing. For understanding how agents work, the plain version is more instructive. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; AWS Strands Agents will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick AWS Strands Agents if
Pick AWS Strands Agents if aWS Strands fits AWS-heavy teams that want a thin SDK, native MCP, and a hosted runtime via Bedrock AgentCore. The model-driven design is genuinely lighter than LangChain — but for teams not on AWS, plain Python is closer to what Strands is doing than any other framework on this list. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Anthropic Agent SDK will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
Anthropic Agent SDK
3.1k
582
Python
MIT
2023-01-17
Anthropic
Google, Spark Capital
Yes
AWS Strands Agents
4.2k
380
Python
Apache-2.0
2025-05-01
AWS
Amazon Web Services
Designed to run on Bedrock AgentCore for hosted deploy + observability
Yes
Used by: Amazon Q Developer, AWS Glue, AWS internal teams
github.com/strands-agents/sdk-python→GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | Anthropic Agent SDK | AWS Strands Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | Claude agent with built-in tools, MCP servers, and system prompt | `Agent(model, tools, system_prompt)` with the model running its own tool-call loop |
| Tools | Built-in tools (`bash`, file read/write, web) + MCP server connections | `@tool` decorator on Python functions; type hints become the schema |
| Agent Loop | SDK's internal agentic loop with automatic tool dispatch | — |
| Sub-Agents | Agents invoke other agents as tools via the SDK | — |
| Lifecycle Hooks | 18 hook events: pre/post tool call, message, error, etc. | — |
| MCP Integration | One-line MCP server config for Playwright, Slack, GitHub, etc. | — |
| Loop | — | Implicit — the model decides when to call tools and when to stop |
| Multi-agent | — | `Graph`, `Swarm`, agents-as-tools, and a workflow primitive |
| MCP | — | First-class MCP server + client support out of the box |
| Deploy | — | Bedrock AgentCore for hosted runtime, observability, identity |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both Anthropic Agent SDK and AWS Strands Agents implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →