Comparisons / Anthropic Agent SDK vs Eve
Anthropic Agent SDK vs Eve: Which Agent Framework to Use?
Anthropic Agent SDK vs Eve, head to head
Anthropic Agent SDK and Eve both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
The Anthropic Agent SDK packages Claude Code's agent loop as a library.
Eve is Vercel's open-source TypeScript agent framework, launched June 17 2026.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick Anthropic Agent SDK if
Pick Anthropic Agent SDK if the Anthropic Agent SDK's real value is packaging Claude Code's battle-tested agent loop with built-in tools and MCP integration. If you want a production agent that reads files, runs commands, and connects to services, it saves significant plumbing. For understanding how agents work, the plain version is more instructive. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Eve will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick Eve if
Pick Eve if eve earns its keep when you want durable execution, sandboxed code exec, and multi-model routing without wiring three separate services. If you're already on Vercel, it composes; if not, the runtime pieces are the value and they don't travel. For a single-loop tool-using agent, plain TypeScript ships faster. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Anthropic Agent SDK will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
Anthropic Agent SDK
3.1k
582
Python
MIT
2023-01-17
Anthropic
Google, Spark Capital
Yes
Eve
3.5k
180
TypeScript
Apache-2.0
2026-06-17
Vercel
Vercel (public)
Runs on Vercel Sandbox + AI Gateway; deploys anywhere Node runs
Yes
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | Anthropic Agent SDK | Eve |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | Claude agent with built-in tools, MCP servers, and system prompt | A directory with `agent.ts` + `instructions.md` + subfolders — the framework wires them together |
| Tools | Built-in tools (`bash`, file read/write, web) + MCP server connections | Each file in `tools/` exports one tool; schema comes from a Zod export |
| Agent Loop | SDK's internal agentic loop with automatic tool dispatch | — |
| Sub-Agents | Agents invoke other agents as tools via the SDK | — |
| Lifecycle Hooks | 18 hook events: pre/post tool call, message, error, etc. | — |
| MCP Integration | One-line MCP server config for Playwright, Slack, GitHub, etc. | — |
| Durability | — | Vercel Workflow SDK checkpoints every step so a crashed agent resumes where it left off |
| Sub-agents | — | Each `subagents/*.ts` becomes a callable sub-agent the parent can hand off to |
| Sandboxed exec | — | Vercel Sandbox runs untrusted code in isolated micro-VMs, one API call away |
| Schedules | — | `schedules/*.ts` exports a cron expression + handler; Vercel runs it |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both Anthropic Agent SDK and Eve implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →