Comparisons / Anthropic Agent SDK vs Flue
Anthropic Agent SDK vs Flue: Which Agent Framework to Use?
Anthropic Agent SDK vs Flue, head to head
Anthropic Agent SDK and Flue both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
The Anthropic Agent SDK packages Claude Code's agent loop as a library.
Flue is a declarative TypeScript agent framework from Fred K.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick Anthropic Agent SDK if
Pick Anthropic Agent SDK if the Anthropic Agent SDK's real value is packaging Claude Code's battle-tested agent loop with built-in tools and MCP integration. If you want a production agent that reads files, runs commands, and connects to services, it saves significant plumbing. For understanding how agents work, the plain version is more instructive. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Flue will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick Flue if
Pick Flue if flue is the natural choice when the deploy target is Cloudflare and you want a TypeScript-first, declarative agent framework tuned for Durable Objects. Its cross-runtime story (Cloudflare + Node + CI) is genuinely useful if agents run in more than one place. For a single-agent loop that doesn't need persistence, plain TypeScript is simpler. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Anthropic Agent SDK will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
Anthropic Agent SDK
3.1k
582
Python
MIT
2023-01-17
Anthropic
Google, Spark Capital
Yes
Flue
2.4k
140
TypeScript
MIT
2026-05-01
Fred K. Schott + Astro team (at Cloudflare)
Cloudflare
Cloudflare Durable Objects; also deploys to Node, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI
Yes
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | Anthropic Agent SDK | Flue |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | Claude agent with built-in tools, MCP servers, and system prompt | `createAgent({ model, instructions, tools })` — declarative config, framework runs the loop |
| Tools | Built-in tools (`bash`, file read/write, web) + MCP server connections | Registered with valibot schemas: `{ name, description, schema, execute }` |
| Agent Loop | SDK's internal agentic loop with automatic tool dispatch | — |
| Sub-Agents | Agents invoke other agents as tools via the SDK | — |
| Lifecycle Hooks | 18 hook events: pre/post tool call, message, error, etc. | — |
| MCP Integration | One-line MCP server config for Playwright, Slack, GitHub, etc. | — |
| State | — | Durable Streams — replayable, checkpointed event log stored in Cloudflare Durable Objects |
| Deployment | — | One config controls deploys to Cloudflare, Node, GitHub Actions, or GitLab CI |
| Runtime | — | The Pi harness — same runtime as OpenClaw, so agents share tooling with that ecosystem |
| Cloudflare-native | — | Durable Objects give per-agent persistence and locking without an external DB |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both Anthropic Agent SDK and Flue implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →