Comparisons / Anthropic Agent SDK vs Mastra
Anthropic Agent SDK vs Mastra: Which Agent Framework to Use?
Anthropic Agent SDK vs Mastra, head to head
Anthropic Agent SDK and Mastra both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
The Anthropic Agent SDK packages Claude Code's agent loop as a library.
Mastra is a TypeScript-first framework for building AI agents, from the team behind Gatsby.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick Anthropic Agent SDK if
Pick Anthropic Agent SDK if the Anthropic Agent SDK's real value is packaging Claude Code's battle-tested agent loop with built-in tools and MCP integration. If you want a production agent that reads files, runs commands, and connects to services, it saves significant plumbing. For understanding how agents work, the plain version is more instructive. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Mastra will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick Mastra if
Pick Mastra if mastra is the best option for TypeScript teams that want a batteries-included agent framework without leaving the Node.js ecosystem. The workflow engine and Studio are genuinely productive. For simple agents or Python teams, the plain approach avoids an unnecessary dependency. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Anthropic Agent SDK will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
Anthropic Agent SDK
3.1k
582
Python
MIT
2023-01-17
Anthropic
Google, Spark Capital
Yes
Mastra
22.7k
1.8k
TypeScript
Apache-2.0
2024-08-06
Mastra AI
Spark Capital, Y Combinator
Series A ($22M, Apr 2026 — $35M total)
244.0k
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | Anthropic Agent SDK | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | Claude agent with built-in tools, MCP servers, and system prompt | `new Agent({ model, instructions, tools })` with automatic tool dispatch |
| Tools | Built-in tools (`bash`, file read/write, web) + MCP server connections | `createTool({ name, schema, execute })` with Zod validation |
| Agent Loop | SDK's internal agentic loop with automatic tool dispatch | — |
| Sub-Agents | Agents invoke other agents as tools via the SDK | — |
| Lifecycle Hooks | 18 hook events: pre/post tool call, message, error, etc. | — |
| MCP Integration | One-line MCP server config for Playwright, Slack, GitHub, etc. | — |
| Workflows | — | `Workflow` class with `.step()`, `.then()`, `.branch()` for orchestration |
| RAG | — | Built-in document syncing, chunking, embedding, and vector search |
| Memory | — | Short-term thread memory + long-term vector memory across sessions |
| Studio | — | Mastra Studio: local GUI for testing agents, viewing traces, debugging |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both Anthropic Agent SDK and Mastra implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →