Comparisons / AWS Bedrock AgentCore vs LlamaIndex
AWS Bedrock AgentCore vs LlamaIndex: Which Agent Framework to Use?
AWS Bedrock AgentCore vs LlamaIndex, head to head
AWS Bedrock AgentCore and LlamaIndex both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
Bedrock AgentCore is AWS's managed runtime for production agents, launched in July 2025.
LlamaIndex started as a RAG framework — connect your data, query it with an LLM.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick AWS Bedrock AgentCore if
Pick AWS Bedrock AgentCore if agentCore is for production AWS deployments where you want to skip the runtime, memory, identity, and observability work and pay AWS to do it instead. It is framework-agnostic — bring Strands, LangGraph, CrewAI, or your own. For non-AWS teams, prototypes, or anything where you want to see what the agent is doing, plain Python on Lambda or a container is simpler. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; LlamaIndex will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick LlamaIndex if
Pick LlamaIndex if llamaIndex adds genuine value when your agent needs to query structured or unstructured data as part of its reasoning — that's the index-as-tool pattern, and it's well-executed. But if you're building a general-purpose agent that doesn't need RAG, the agent framework is overhead. The plain Python version of the agent loop is the same 60 lines either way. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; AWS Bedrock AgentCore will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
AWS Bedrock AgentCore
Managed service
Proprietary (AWS)
2025-07-16
AWS
Amazon Web Services
AgentCore Runtime, Memory, Identity, Gateway, Observability — pay-as-you-go on AWS
Yes
Used by: AWS internal teams, Amazon Q Developer
github.com/(closed-source SaaS — see strands-agents/* on GitHub for the SDK side)→LlamaIndex
48.3k
7.2k
Python
MIT
2022-11-02
Jerry Liu
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | AWS Bedrock AgentCore | LlamaIndex |
|---|---|---|
| Runtime | Sandboxed, low-latency container per session, up to 8h, MicroVM-isolated | — |
| Memory | Managed short-term + long-term memory with semantic recall and namespacing | `ChatMemoryBuffer` with token limit, or custom memory modules |
| Identity | OAuth flows, AWS IAM, Secrets Manager integration, per-user credential vending | — |
| Gateway | Turn any API or Lambda into an MCP-compliant tool with one config | — |
| Observability | OpenTelemetry traces, per-step LLM call costs, error grouping in CloudWatch | — |
| Browser | Managed isolated browser tool for agent web actions | — |
| Agent | — | `AgentRunner` with `AgentWorker`, or `ReActAgent` for tool-calling agents |
| Tools | — | `FunctionTool` for custom tools, `QueryEngineTool` to query an index as a tool |
| Agent Loop | — | `AgentRunner.chat()` manages step-by-step execution via `AgentWorker` tasks |
| RAG Integration | — | `VectorStoreIndex` + `QueryEngineTool` — the agent can query your data as a tool call |
| Orchestration | — | `AgentRunner` step API for custom control flow, or multi-agent pipelines |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both AWS Bedrock AgentCore and LlamaIndex implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →