Comparisons / ControlFlow vs Flue
ControlFlow vs Flue: Which Agent Framework to Use?
ControlFlow vs Flue, head to head
ControlFlow and Flue both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
ControlFlow by Prefect flips the typical agent framework: instead of defining agents that choose tasks, you define tasks and assign agents to them.
Flue is a declarative TypeScript agent framework from Fred K.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick ControlFlow if
Pick ControlFlow if controlFlow's task-centric model is a genuinely different way to think about agent orchestration — define what you want, not how to get it. The Prefect integration adds real production value. But if your workflow is linear and your tasks are simple, plain function composition does the same job with less ceremony. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Flue will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick Flue if
Pick Flue if flue is the natural choice when the deploy target is Cloudflare and you want a TypeScript-first, declarative agent framework tuned for Durable Objects. Its cross-runtime story (Cloudflare + Node + CI) is genuinely useful if agents run in more than one place. For a single-agent loop that doesn't need persistence, plain TypeScript is simpler. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; ControlFlow will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
ControlFlow
1.5k
120
Python
Apache-2.0
2024-05-01
Prefect
Flue
2.4k
140
TypeScript
MIT
2026-05-01
Fred K. Schott + Astro team (at Cloudflare)
Cloudflare
Cloudflare Durable Objects; also deploys to Node, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI
Yes
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | ControlFlow | Flue |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | `cf.Agent()` with name, model, instructions, and tool access | `createAgent({ model, instructions, tools })` — declarative config, framework runs the loop |
| Tools | Python functions passed to `Task()` or `Agent()` as tool lists | Registered with valibot schemas: `{ name, description, schema, execute }` |
| Task | `cf.Task()` with `result_type`, `instructions`, `agents`, and `dependencies` | — |
| Flow | `@cf.flow` decorator composing tasks with dependency resolution | — |
| Multi-Agent | Multiple `cf.Agent()` instances assigned to different tasks in one flow | — |
| Observability | Built-in Prefect integration for logging, retries, and monitoring | — |
| State | — | Durable Streams — replayable, checkpointed event log stored in Cloudflare Durable Objects |
| Deployment | — | One config controls deploys to Cloudflare, Node, GitHub Actions, or GitLab CI |
| Runtime | — | The Pi harness — same runtime as OpenClaw, so agents share tooling with that ecosystem |
| Cloudflare-native | — | Durable Objects give per-agent persistence and locking without an external DB |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both ControlFlow and Flue implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →