Comparisons / ControlFlow vs LangGraph
ControlFlow vs LangGraph: Which Agent Framework to Use?
ControlFlow vs LangGraph, head to head
ControlFlow and LangGraph both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
ControlFlow by Prefect flips the typical agent framework: instead of defining agents that choose tasks, you define tasks and assign agents to them.
LangGraph is LangChain's stateful workflow framework — a graph of nodes (functions) connected by edges with shared state.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick ControlFlow if
Pick ControlFlow if controlFlow's task-centric model is a genuinely different way to think about agent orchestration — define what you want, not how to get it. The Prefect integration adds real production value. But if your workflow is linear and your tasks are simple, plain function composition does the same job with less ceremony. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; LangGraph will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick LangGraph if
Pick LangGraph if langGraph earns its weight when your agent is a workflow — explicit branches, checkpoints, parallel branches, or a human approval gate. For a single-agent loop, the graph machinery is overkill and a plain while loop is faster to write, debug, and ship. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; ControlFlow will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
ControlFlow
1.5k
120
Python
Apache-2.0
2024-05-01
Prefect
LangGraph
18.9k
3.4k
Python
MIT
2024-01-17
LangChain Inc (Harrison Chase)
Sequoia Capital, Benchmark
Part of LangChain Inc — $50M raised across A and B
8.2M
LangGraph Platform (hosted), LangSmith (observability)
Yes
Used by: Replit, Klarna, Elastic
github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph→GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | ControlFlow | LangGraph |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | `cf.Agent()` with name, model, instructions, and tool access | A `StateGraph` with nodes, edges, and a typed `State` channel |
| Tools | Python functions passed to `Task()` or `Agent()` as tool lists | `ToolNode(tools)` paired with a conditional edge for routing |
| Task | `cf.Task()` with `result_type`, `instructions`, `agents`, and `dependencies` | — |
| Flow | `@cf.flow` decorator composing tasks with dependency resolution | — |
| Multi-Agent | Multiple `cf.Agent()` instances assigned to different tasks in one flow | — |
| Observability | Built-in Prefect integration for logging, retries, and monitoring | — |
| Loop | — | `add_conditional_edges` from a node back to itself until a `END` condition |
| State | — | Typed `State` channels with reducers (`Annotated[list, add_messages]`) |
| Checkpointing | — | `MemorySaver` / `PostgresSaver` persists state per `thread_id` |
| Human-in-loop | — | `interrupt_before` / `interrupt_after` pauses execution for review |
| Parallel fanout | — | Multiple edges from one node + reducers merge results |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both ControlFlow and LangGraph implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →