Comparisons / CrewAI vs Google ADK

CrewAI vs Google ADK: Which Agent Framework to Use?

CrewAI organizes work into Agents, Tasks, and Crews. Google's Agent Development Kit (ADK) is an open-source framework for building multi-agent systems. Here is how they compare — paradigm, ecosystem, and the use cases each one is actually built for.

By the numbers

CrewAI

GitHub Stars

48.0k

Forks

6.5k

Language

Python

License

MIT

Created

2023-10-27

Created by

João Moura

github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI

Google ADK

GitHub Stars

18.7k

Forks

3.2k

Language

Python

License

Apache-2.0

Created

2025-04-01

Created by

Google

Backed by

Google/Alphabet

Cloud/SaaS

Vertex AI

Production ready

Yes

github.com/google/adk-python

GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.

ConceptCrewAIGoogle ADK
Agent`Agent(role, goal, backstory, tools, llm)``LlmAgent` class with model, instructions, and `sub_agents` list
ToolsTool registration with `@tool` decorator, custom `Tool` classes`FunctionTool`, built-in tools (Search, Code Exec), third-party integrations
Agent LoopInternal to `Agent` execution, hidden from user`Runner.run()` with automatic tool dispatch and sub-agent delegation
Task Delegation`Crew(agents, tasks, process=sequential/hierarchical)`
Memory`ShortTermMemory`, `LongTermMemory`, `EntityMemory`
StateTask output passed between agents via `Crew` orchestration
Multi-AgentHierarchical agent tree with root agent delegating to specialized sub-agents
Workflows`SequentialAgent`, `ParallelAgent`, `LoopAgent` workflow primitives
SessionSession and State service with typed channels and persistence

CrewAI vs Google ADK, head to head

CrewAI CrewAI organizes work into Agents, Tasks, and Crews.

Google ADK Google's Agent Development Kit (ADK) is an open-source framework for building multi-agent systems.

Both wrap the same underlying agent pattern — an LLM call, a tool dispatch, a loop — in different abstractions. The choice between them is mostly about which mental model and ecosystem fits the team you have, not which one is technically more capable.

Pick CrewAI if

Pick CrewAI if crewAI shines for multi-agent setups where you want named roles ("researcher", "writer"). But the core mechanics — tool dispatch, the agent loop, task scheduling — are the same patterns you can build in plain Python. CrewAI is the right fit when the tradeoffs in its intro line up with how your team actually wants to work day-to-day; Google ADK would force you to translate.

Full CrewAIcomparison →

Pick Google ADK if

Pick Google ADK if aDK earns its complexity when you need multi-agent orchestration on Google Cloud with Vertex AI deployment. If you're using Gemini and need production-grade agent infrastructure, it's well-designed. For single-agent use cases or non-Google stacks, plain Python keeps things simpler. Google ADK is the right fit when the tradeoffs in its intro line up with how your team actually wants to work day-to-day; CrewAI would force you to translate.

Full Google ADKcomparison →

What both add

Both CrewAI and Google ADK pull in a class hierarchy and a dependency tree to wrap what is, at the core, an HTTP POST in a while loop. If your use case is straightforward — one provider, a handful of tools, a single agent — the framework cost may exceed the framework benefit. The lesson below shows the same pattern in ~60 lines without either dependency.

Or build your own in 60 lines

Both CrewAI and Google ADK implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.

No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.

Build it from scratch →