Comparisons / CrewAI vs Rasa
CrewAI vs Rasa: Which Agent Framework to Use?
CrewAI vs Rasa, head to head
CrewAI and Rasa both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
CrewAI organizes work into Agents, Tasks, and Crews.
Rasa is an open-source framework for building conversational AI — chatbots and virtual assistants.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick CrewAI if
Pick CrewAI if crewAI shines for multi-agent setups where you want named roles ("researcher", "writer"). But the core mechanics — tool dispatch, the agent loop, task scheduling — are the same patterns you can build in plain Python. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Rasa will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick Rasa if
Pick Rasa if rasa is purpose-built for production conversational AI with enterprise requirements — on-premise deployment, regulatory compliance, deterministic business logic. For general-purpose agents or simple chatbots, an LLM with a system prompt and a few tools is faster to build and more flexible. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; CrewAI will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
CrewAI
48.0k
6.5k
Python
MIT
2023-10-27
João Moura
Rasa
21.1k
4.9k
Python
Apache-2.0
2016-10-14
Rasa Technologies
Rasa Pro / Rasa Cloud
Yes
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | CrewAI | Rasa |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | `Agent(role, goal, backstory, tools, llm)` | Rasa agent with NLU pipeline, dialogue policies, and action server |
| Tools | Tool registration with `@tool` decorator, custom `Tool` classes | Custom actions running on a separate action server via HTTP |
| Agent Loop | Internal to `Agent` execution, hidden from user | — |
| Task Delegation | `Crew(agents, tasks, process=sequential/hierarchical)` | — |
| Memory | `ShortTermMemory`, `LongTermMemory`, `EntityMemory` | — |
| State | Task output passed between agents via `Crew` orchestration | — |
| NLU | — | NLU pipeline: tokenizer, featurizer, intent classifier, entity extractor |
| Dialogue | — | Stories/Rules YAML + dialogue policies for conversation flow |
| Slots | — | Typed slots for tracking entities and state across turns |
| CALM | — | LLM for understanding + deterministic `Flows` for business logic |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both CrewAI and Rasa implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →