Comparisons / DSPy vs OpenAI Agents SDK

DSPy vs OpenAI Agents SDK: Which Agent Framework to Use?

DSPy vs OpenAI Agents SDK, head to head

DSPy and OpenAI Agents SDK both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.

DSPy replaces hand-written prompts with compiled modules.

OpenAI's Agents SDK (evolved from Swarm) provides Agent, Runner, handoffs, and guardrails.

Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.

Pick DSPy if

Pick DSPy if dSPy's real innovation is automated prompt optimization — replacing manual prompt engineering with algorithmic tuning. This is genuinely novel and valuable for production systems where prompt quality matters at scale. For simple agents or learning, hand-written prompts are easier to understand and modify. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; OpenAI Agents SDK will feel like translation if they don't.

Full DSPycomparison →

Pick OpenAI Agents SDK if

Pick OpenAI Agents SDK if the Agents SDK is the thinnest framework on this list — it barely abstracts beyond what you'd write yourself. Use it when you want OpenAI's conventions and auto-schema generation. Skip it when you want full control or use non-OpenAI models. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; DSPy will feel like translation if they don't.

Full OpenAI Agents SDKcomparison →

What both add

Whichever you pick, you're inheriting a dependency tree and a vocabulary your team has to learn before they ship anything. DSPy has its own class hierarchy and tool registration conventions; OpenAI Agents SDK has its. Either way, when something misbehaves you'll be reading framework source before you reach the actual HTTP call.

If the real workload is one model and a handful of tools, both can feel like a workbench for driving a nail. The lesson below builds the same pattern in plain Python — useful as a comparison point even if you ultimately keep the framework.

By the numbers

By the numbers

DSPy

GitHub Stars

33.4k

Forks

2.8k

Language

Python

License

MIT

Created

2023-01-09

Created by

Stanford NLP (Omar Khattab)

github.com/stanfordnlp/dspy

OpenAI Agents SDK

GitHub Stars

20.6k

Forks

3.4k

Language

Python

License

MIT

Created

2025-03-11

Created by

OpenAI

github.com/openai/openai-agents-python

GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.

ConceptDSPyOpenAI Agents SDK
Agent`dspy.ReAct` module with signature and tools`Agent(name, instructions, model, tools)`
Prompts`dspy.Signature` defines input/output fields, compiled to optimized prompts
Optimization`dspy.BootstrapFewShot`, `MIPROv2` auto-tune prompts against a metric
ToolsTools passed to `ReAct` module as callable listPython functions with type hints, auto-converted to schemas
Chaining`dspy.ChainOfThought`, `dspy.Module` with `forward()` composition
Evaluation`dspy.Evaluate` with metric functions and dev sets
Agent Loop`Runner.run()` handles the loop internally
Handoffs`Handoff` between `Agent` objects for multi-agent routing
Guardrails`InputGuardrail` and `OutputGuardrail` with tripwire pattern
ContextTyped context object passed through the agent lifecycle

Or build your own in 60 lines

Both DSPy and OpenAI Agents SDK implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.

No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.

Build it from scratch →