Comparisons / Eve vs Semantic Kernel
Eve vs Semantic Kernel: Which Agent Framework to Use?
Eve vs Semantic Kernel, head to head
Eve and Semantic Kernel both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
Eve is Vercel's open-source TypeScript agent framework, launched June 17 2026.
Semantic Kernel is Microsoft's enterprise SDK for building AI agents.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick Eve if
Pick Eve if eve earns its keep when you want durable execution, sandboxed code exec, and multi-model routing without wiring three separate services. If you're already on Vercel, it composes; if not, the runtime pieces are the value and they don't travel. For a single-loop tool-using agent, plain TypeScript ships faster. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Semantic Kernel will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick Semantic Kernel if
Pick Semantic Kernel if semantic Kernel earns its complexity in enterprise environments with Azure OpenAI, .NET backends, and existing Microsoft infrastructure. But the core agent pattern — LLM call, tool dispatch, loop — is identical to what you can build in 60 lines of Python. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Eve will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
Eve
3.5k
180
TypeScript
Apache-2.0
2026-06-17
Vercel
Vercel (public)
Runs on Vercel Sandbox + AI Gateway; deploys anywhere Node runs
Yes
Semantic Kernel
27.6k
4.5k
C#
MIT
2023-02-27
Microsoft
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | Eve | Semantic Kernel |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | A directory with `agent.ts` + `instructions.md` + subfolders — the framework wires them together | `ChatCompletionAgent` with `Kernel`, instructions, and service config |
| Tools | Each file in `tools/` exports one tool; schema comes from a Zod export | — |
| Durability | Vercel Workflow SDK checkpoints every step so a crashed agent resumes where it left off | — |
| Sub-agents | Each `subagents/*.ts` becomes a callable sub-agent the parent can hand off to | — |
| Sandboxed exec | Vercel Sandbox runs untrusted code in isolated micro-VMs, one API call away | — |
| Schedules | `schedules/*.ts` exports a cron expression + handler; Vercel runs it | — |
| Tools / Plugins | — | `KernelPlugin` with `@kernel_function` decorators, typed parameters |
| Planning | — | `StepwisePlanner`, `HandlebarsPlanner` for multi-step decomposition |
| Memory | — | `SemanticTextMemory` with embeddings and vector stores |
| Orchestration | — | `Kernel.invoke()` with plugin resolution and filter pipeline |
| Multi-Language | — | C#, Python, Java SDKs with shared abstractions |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both Eve and Semantic Kernel implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →