Comparisons / Flue vs LlamaIndex
Flue vs LlamaIndex: Which Agent Framework to Use?
Flue vs LlamaIndex, head to head
Flue and LlamaIndex both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
Flue is a declarative TypeScript agent framework from Fred K.
LlamaIndex started as a RAG framework — connect your data, query it with an LLM.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick Flue if
Pick Flue if flue is the natural choice when the deploy target is Cloudflare and you want a TypeScript-first, declarative agent framework tuned for Durable Objects. Its cross-runtime story (Cloudflare + Node + CI) is genuinely useful if agents run in more than one place. For a single-agent loop that doesn't need persistence, plain TypeScript is simpler. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; LlamaIndex will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick LlamaIndex if
Pick LlamaIndex if llamaIndex adds genuine value when your agent needs to query structured or unstructured data as part of its reasoning — that's the index-as-tool pattern, and it's well-executed. But if you're building a general-purpose agent that doesn't need RAG, the agent framework is overhead. The plain Python version of the agent loop is the same 60 lines either way. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Flue will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
Flue
2.4k
140
TypeScript
MIT
2026-05-01
Fred K. Schott + Astro team (at Cloudflare)
Cloudflare
Cloudflare Durable Objects; also deploys to Node, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI
Yes
LlamaIndex
48.3k
7.2k
Python
MIT
2022-11-02
Jerry Liu
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | Flue | LlamaIndex |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | `createAgent({ model, instructions, tools })` — declarative config, framework runs the loop | `AgentRunner` with `AgentWorker`, or `ReActAgent` for tool-calling agents |
| Tools | Registered with valibot schemas: `{ name, description, schema, execute }` | `FunctionTool` for custom tools, `QueryEngineTool` to query an index as a tool |
| State | Durable Streams — replayable, checkpointed event log stored in Cloudflare Durable Objects | — |
| Deployment | One config controls deploys to Cloudflare, Node, GitHub Actions, or GitLab CI | — |
| Runtime | The Pi harness — same runtime as OpenClaw, so agents share tooling with that ecosystem | — |
| Cloudflare-native | Durable Objects give per-agent persistence and locking without an external DB | — |
| Agent Loop | — | `AgentRunner.chat()` manages step-by-step execution via `AgentWorker` tasks |
| RAG Integration | — | `VectorStoreIndex` + `QueryEngineTool` — the agent can query your data as a tool call |
| Memory | — | `ChatMemoryBuffer` with token limit, or custom memory modules |
| Orchestration | — | `AgentRunner` step API for custom control flow, or multi-agent pipelines |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both Flue and LlamaIndex implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →