Comparisons / Google ADK vs Haystack
Google ADK vs Haystack: Which Agent Framework to Use?
Google ADK vs Haystack, head to head
Google ADK and Haystack both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
Google's Agent Development Kit (ADK) is an open-source framework for building multi-agent systems.
Haystack by deepset is a framework for building NLP and LLM pipelines.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick Google ADK if
Pick Google ADK if aDK earns its complexity when you need multi-agent orchestration on Google Cloud with Vertex AI deployment. If you're using Gemini and need production-grade agent infrastructure, it's well-designed. For single-agent use cases or non-Google stacks, plain Python keeps things simpler. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Haystack will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick Haystack if
Pick Haystack if haystack earns its complexity when you're building RAG pipelines with multiple retrieval stages, document processing, and production deployment needs. But for straightforward agents with a few tools, the plain Python version is simpler to write and debug. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Google ADK will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
Google ADK
18.7k
3.2k
Python
Apache-2.0
2025-04-01
Google/Alphabet
Vertex AI
Yes
Haystack
24.7k
2.7k
Python
Apache-2.0
2019-11-14
deepset
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | Google ADK | Haystack |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | `LlmAgent` class with model, instructions, and `sub_agents` list | `Agent` component with `ChatGenerator`, tool definitions, and message routing |
| Tools | `FunctionTool`, built-in tools (Search, Code Exec), third-party integrations | `Tool` dataclass with function reference, name, description, parameters schema |
| Agent Loop | `Runner.run()` with automatic tool dispatch and sub-agent delegation | — |
| Multi-Agent | Hierarchical agent tree with root agent delegating to specialized sub-agents | — |
| Workflows | `SequentialAgent`, `ParallelAgent`, `LoopAgent` workflow primitives | — |
| Session | Session and State service with typed channels and persistence | — |
| Pipeline Architecture | — | `Pipeline()` with `add_component()` and `connect()` — a directed graph of typed components |
| RAG / Retrieval | — | `DocumentStore` + `Retriever` + `PromptBuilder` + `Generator` wired in a `Pipeline` |
| Memory | — | `ChatMessageStore` with `ConversationMemory` component in pipeline |
| Deployment | — | Pipeline YAML serialization, `Hayhooks` REST server |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both Google ADK and Haystack implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →