Comparisons / Google ADK vs LlamaIndex

Google ADK vs LlamaIndex: Which Agent Framework to Use?

Google ADK vs LlamaIndex, head to head

Google ADK and LlamaIndex both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.

Google's Agent Development Kit (ADK) is an open-source framework for building multi-agent systems.

LlamaIndex started as a RAG framework — connect your data, query it with an LLM.

Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.

Pick Google ADK if

Pick Google ADK if aDK earns its complexity when you need multi-agent orchestration on Google Cloud with Vertex AI deployment. If you're using Gemini and need production-grade agent infrastructure, it's well-designed. For single-agent use cases or non-Google stacks, plain Python keeps things simpler. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; LlamaIndex will feel like translation if they don't.

Full Google ADKcomparison →

Pick LlamaIndex if

Pick LlamaIndex if llamaIndex adds genuine value when your agent needs to query structured or unstructured data as part of its reasoning — that's the index-as-tool pattern, and it's well-executed. But if you're building a general-purpose agent that doesn't need RAG, the agent framework is overhead. The plain Python version of the agent loop is the same 60 lines either way. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Google ADK will feel like translation if they don't.

Full LlamaIndexcomparison →

What both add

Whichever you pick, you're inheriting a dependency tree and a vocabulary your team has to learn before they ship anything. Google ADK has its own class hierarchy and tool registration conventions; LlamaIndex has its. Either way, when something misbehaves you'll be reading framework source before you reach the actual HTTP call.

If the real workload is one model and a handful of tools, both can feel like a workbench for driving a nail. The lesson below builds the same pattern in plain Python — useful as a comparison point even if you ultimately keep the framework.

By the numbers

By the numbers

Google ADK

GitHub Stars

18.7k

Forks

3.2k

Language

Python

License

Apache-2.0

Created

2025-04-01

Created by

Google

Backed by

Google/Alphabet

Cloud/SaaS

Vertex AI

Production ready

Yes

github.com/google/adk-python

LlamaIndex

GitHub Stars

48.3k

Forks

7.2k

Language

Python

License

MIT

Created

2022-11-02

Created by

Jerry Liu

github.com/run-llama/llama_index

GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.

ConceptGoogle ADKLlamaIndex
Agent`LlmAgent` class with model, instructions, and `sub_agents` list`AgentRunner` with `AgentWorker`, or `ReActAgent` for tool-calling agents
Tools`FunctionTool`, built-in tools (Search, Code Exec), third-party integrations`FunctionTool` for custom tools, `QueryEngineTool` to query an index as a tool
Agent Loop`Runner.run()` with automatic tool dispatch and sub-agent delegation`AgentRunner.chat()` manages step-by-step execution via `AgentWorker` tasks
Multi-AgentHierarchical agent tree with root agent delegating to specialized sub-agents
Workflows`SequentialAgent`, `ParallelAgent`, `LoopAgent` workflow primitives
SessionSession and State service with typed channels and persistence
RAG Integration`VectorStoreIndex` + `QueryEngineTool` — the agent can query your data as a tool call
Memory`ChatMemoryBuffer` with token limit, or custom memory modules
Orchestration`AgentRunner` step API for custom control flow, or multi-agent pipelines

Or build your own in 60 lines

Both Google ADK and LlamaIndex implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.

No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.

Build it from scratch →