Comparisons / Google ADK vs LlamaIndex
Google ADK vs LlamaIndex: Which Agent Framework to Use?
Google ADK vs LlamaIndex, head to head
Google ADK and LlamaIndex both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
Google's Agent Development Kit (ADK) is an open-source framework for building multi-agent systems.
LlamaIndex started as a RAG framework — connect your data, query it with an LLM.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick Google ADK if
Pick Google ADK if aDK earns its complexity when you need multi-agent orchestration on Google Cloud with Vertex AI deployment. If you're using Gemini and need production-grade agent infrastructure, it's well-designed. For single-agent use cases or non-Google stacks, plain Python keeps things simpler. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; LlamaIndex will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick LlamaIndex if
Pick LlamaIndex if llamaIndex adds genuine value when your agent needs to query structured or unstructured data as part of its reasoning — that's the index-as-tool pattern, and it's well-executed. But if you're building a general-purpose agent that doesn't need RAG, the agent framework is overhead. The plain Python version of the agent loop is the same 60 lines either way. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Google ADK will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
Google ADK
18.7k
3.2k
Python
Apache-2.0
2025-04-01
Google/Alphabet
Vertex AI
Yes
LlamaIndex
48.3k
7.2k
Python
MIT
2022-11-02
Jerry Liu
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | Google ADK | LlamaIndex |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | `LlmAgent` class with model, instructions, and `sub_agents` list | `AgentRunner` with `AgentWorker`, or `ReActAgent` for tool-calling agents |
| Tools | `FunctionTool`, built-in tools (Search, Code Exec), third-party integrations | `FunctionTool` for custom tools, `QueryEngineTool` to query an index as a tool |
| Agent Loop | `Runner.run()` with automatic tool dispatch and sub-agent delegation | `AgentRunner.chat()` manages step-by-step execution via `AgentWorker` tasks |
| Multi-Agent | Hierarchical agent tree with root agent delegating to specialized sub-agents | — |
| Workflows | `SequentialAgent`, `ParallelAgent`, `LoopAgent` workflow primitives | — |
| Session | Session and State service with typed channels and persistence | — |
| RAG Integration | — | `VectorStoreIndex` + `QueryEngineTool` — the agent can query your data as a tool call |
| Memory | — | `ChatMemoryBuffer` with token limit, or custom memory modules |
| Orchestration | — | `AgentRunner` step API for custom control flow, or multi-agent pipelines |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both Google ADK and LlamaIndex implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →