Comparisons / Haystack vs Semantic Kernel
Haystack vs Semantic Kernel: Which Agent Framework to Use?
Haystack vs Semantic Kernel, head to head
Haystack and Semantic Kernel both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
Haystack by deepset is a framework for building NLP and LLM pipelines.
Semantic Kernel is Microsoft's enterprise SDK for building AI agents.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick Haystack if
Pick Haystack if haystack earns its complexity when you're building RAG pipelines with multiple retrieval stages, document processing, and production deployment needs. But for straightforward agents with a few tools, the plain Python version is simpler to write and debug. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Semantic Kernel will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick Semantic Kernel if
Pick Semantic Kernel if semantic Kernel earns its complexity in enterprise environments with Azure OpenAI, .NET backends, and existing Microsoft infrastructure. But the core agent pattern — LLM call, tool dispatch, loop — is identical to what you can build in 60 lines of Python. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Haystack will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
Haystack
24.7k
2.7k
Python
Apache-2.0
2019-11-14
deepset
Semantic Kernel
27.6k
4.5k
C#
MIT
2023-02-27
Microsoft
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | Haystack | Semantic Kernel |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | `Agent` component with `ChatGenerator`, tool definitions, and message routing | `ChatCompletionAgent` with `Kernel`, instructions, and service config |
| Tools | `Tool` dataclass with function reference, name, description, parameters schema | — |
| Pipeline Architecture | `Pipeline()` with `add_component()` and `connect()` — a directed graph of typed components | — |
| RAG / Retrieval | `DocumentStore` + `Retriever` + `PromptBuilder` + `Generator` wired in a `Pipeline` | — |
| Memory | `ChatMessageStore` with `ConversationMemory` component in pipeline | `SemanticTextMemory` with embeddings and vector stores |
| Deployment | Pipeline YAML serialization, `Hayhooks` REST server | — |
| Tools / Plugins | — | `KernelPlugin` with `@kernel_function` decorators, typed parameters |
| Planning | — | `StepwisePlanner`, `HandlebarsPlanner` for multi-step decomposition |
| Orchestration | — | `Kernel.invoke()` with plugin resolution and filter pipeline |
| Multi-Language | — | C#, Python, Java SDKs with shared abstractions |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both Haystack and Semantic Kernel implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →