Comparisons / LangChain vs Semantic Kernel
LangChain vs Semantic Kernel: Which Agent Framework to Use?
LangChain vs Semantic Kernel, head to head
LangChain and Semantic Kernel both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
LangChain is the most popular agent framework.
Semantic Kernel is Microsoft's enterprise SDK for building AI agents.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick LangChain if
Pick LangChain if langChain adds value when you need production integrations (vector stores, specific LLM providers, deployment tooling). But if you want to understand what's happening — or your use case is straightforward — the plain Python version is easier to debug, modify, and reason about. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Semantic Kernel will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick Semantic Kernel if
Pick Semantic Kernel if semantic Kernel earns its complexity in enterprise environments with Azure OpenAI, .NET backends, and existing Microsoft infrastructure. But the core agent pattern — LLM call, tool dispatch, loop — is identical to what you can build in 60 lines of Python. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; LangChain will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
LangChain
132.3k
21.8k
Python
MIT
2022-10-17
Harrison Chase
Sequoia Capital, Benchmark
$25M Series A (2023), $25M Series B (2024)
3.5M
LangSmith (observability), LangServe (deployment)
Yes
Used by: Notion, Elastic, Instacart
github.com/langchain-ai/langchain→Semantic Kernel
27.6k
4.5k
C#
MIT
2023-02-27
Microsoft
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | LangChain | Semantic Kernel |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | `AgentExecutor` with `LLMChain`, `PromptTemplate`, `OutputParser` | `ChatCompletionAgent` with `Kernel`, instructions, and service config |
| Tools | `@tool` decorator, `StructuredTool`, `BaseTool` class hierarchy | — |
| Agent Loop | `AgentExecutor.invoke()` with internal iteration | — |
| Conversation | `ConversationBufferMemory`, `ConversationSummaryMemory` | — |
| State | LangGraph state channels with typed reducers | — |
| Memory | `VectorStoreRetrieverMemory`, `ConversationEntityMemory` | `SemanticTextMemory` with embeddings and vector stores |
| Guardrails | `OutputParser`, `PydanticOutputParser`, custom validators | — |
| Tools / Plugins | — | `KernelPlugin` with `@kernel_function` decorators, typed parameters |
| Planning | — | `StepwisePlanner`, `HandlebarsPlanner` for multi-step decomposition |
| Orchestration | — | `Kernel.invoke()` with plugin resolution and filter pipeline |
| Multi-Language | — | C#, Python, Java SDKs with shared abstractions |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both LangChain and Semantic Kernel implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →