Comparisons / LangGraph vs LlamaIndex
LangGraph vs LlamaIndex: Which Agent Framework to Use?
LangGraph vs LlamaIndex, head to head
LangGraph and LlamaIndex both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
LangGraph is LangChain's stateful workflow framework — a graph of nodes (functions) connected by edges with shared state.
LlamaIndex started as a RAG framework — connect your data, query it with an LLM.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick LangGraph if
Pick LangGraph if langGraph earns its weight when your agent is a workflow — explicit branches, checkpoints, parallel branches, or a human approval gate. For a single-agent loop, the graph machinery is overkill and a plain while loop is faster to write, debug, and ship. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; LlamaIndex will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick LlamaIndex if
Pick LlamaIndex if llamaIndex adds genuine value when your agent needs to query structured or unstructured data as part of its reasoning — that's the index-as-tool pattern, and it's well-executed. But if you're building a general-purpose agent that doesn't need RAG, the agent framework is overhead. The plain Python version of the agent loop is the same 60 lines either way. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; LangGraph will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
LangGraph
18.9k
3.4k
Python
MIT
2024-01-17
LangChain Inc (Harrison Chase)
Sequoia Capital, Benchmark
Part of LangChain Inc — $50M raised across A and B
8.2M
LangGraph Platform (hosted), LangSmith (observability)
Yes
Used by: Replit, Klarna, Elastic
github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph→LlamaIndex
48.3k
7.2k
Python
MIT
2022-11-02
Jerry Liu
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | LangGraph | LlamaIndex |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | A `StateGraph` with nodes, edges, and a typed `State` channel | `AgentRunner` with `AgentWorker`, or `ReActAgent` for tool-calling agents |
| Tools | `ToolNode(tools)` paired with a conditional edge for routing | `FunctionTool` for custom tools, `QueryEngineTool` to query an index as a tool |
| Loop | `add_conditional_edges` from a node back to itself until a `END` condition | — |
| State | Typed `State` channels with reducers (`Annotated[list, add_messages]`) | — |
| Checkpointing | `MemorySaver` / `PostgresSaver` persists state per `thread_id` | — |
| Human-in-loop | `interrupt_before` / `interrupt_after` pauses execution for review | — |
| Parallel fanout | Multiple edges from one node + reducers merge results | — |
| Agent Loop | — | `AgentRunner.chat()` manages step-by-step execution via `AgentWorker` tasks |
| RAG Integration | — | `VectorStoreIndex` + `QueryEngineTool` — the agent can query your data as a tool call |
| Memory | — | `ChatMemoryBuffer` with token limit, or custom memory modules |
| Orchestration | — | `AgentRunner` step API for custom control flow, or multi-agent pipelines |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both LangGraph and LlamaIndex implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →