Comparisons / LangGraph vs Pydantic AI
LangGraph vs Pydantic AI: Which Agent Framework to Use?
LangGraph vs Pydantic AI, head to head
LangGraph and Pydantic AI both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
LangGraph is LangChain's stateful workflow framework — a graph of nodes (functions) connected by edges with shared state.
Pydantic AI is a type-safe agent framework built by the Pydantic team.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick LangGraph if
Pick LangGraph if langGraph earns its weight when your agent is a workflow — explicit branches, checkpoints, parallel branches, or a human approval gate. For a single-agent loop, the graph machinery is overkill and a plain while loop is faster to write, debug, and ship. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Pydantic AI will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick Pydantic AI if
Pick Pydantic AI if pydantic AI adds genuine value if you want compile-time type checking across your agent's tools, outputs, and dependencies. If you already use Pydantic in your stack, it fits naturally. But the core agent logic — loop, dispatch, validate — is still ~60 lines of Python you can own entirely. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; LangGraph will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
LangGraph
18.9k
3.4k
Python
MIT
2024-01-17
LangChain Inc (Harrison Chase)
Sequoia Capital, Benchmark
Part of LangChain Inc — $50M raised across A and B
8.2M
LangGraph Platform (hosted), LangSmith (observability)
Yes
Used by: Replit, Klarna, Elastic
github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph→Pydantic AI
16.1k
1.9k
Python
MIT
2024-06-21
Pydantic (Samuel Colvin)
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | LangGraph | Pydantic AI |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | A `StateGraph` with nodes, edges, and a typed `State` channel | `Agent()` class with typed `result_type`, system prompt, and `model` parameter |
| Tools | `ToolNode(tools)` paired with a conditional edge for routing | `@agent.tool` decorator with typed parameters and Pydantic validation |
| Loop | `add_conditional_edges` from a node back to itself until a `END` condition | — |
| State | Typed `State` channels with reducers (`Annotated[list, add_messages]`) | — |
| Checkpointing | `MemorySaver` / `PostgresSaver` persists state per `thread_id` | — |
| Human-in-loop | `interrupt_before` / `interrupt_after` pauses execution for review | — |
| Parallel fanout | Multiple edges from one node + reducers merge results | — |
| Agent Loop | — | `agent.run()` handles the tool-call loop internally with typed dispatch |
| Structured Output | — | `result_type=MyModel` enforces Pydantic model on final LLM response |
| Model Switching | — | Swap `model='openai:gpt-4o'` to `model='anthropic:claude-sonnet'` in one line |
| Dependencies | — | `RunContext[DepsType]` injects typed dependencies into tools at runtime |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both LangGraph and Pydantic AI implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →