Comparisons / LangGraph vs Semantic Kernel
LangGraph vs Semantic Kernel: Which Agent Framework to Use?
LangGraph vs Semantic Kernel, head to head
LangGraph and Semantic Kernel both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
LangGraph is LangChain's stateful workflow framework — a graph of nodes (functions) connected by edges with shared state.
Semantic Kernel is Microsoft's enterprise SDK for building AI agents.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick LangGraph if
Pick LangGraph if langGraph earns its weight when your agent is a workflow — explicit branches, checkpoints, parallel branches, or a human approval gate. For a single-agent loop, the graph machinery is overkill and a plain while loop is faster to write, debug, and ship. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Semantic Kernel will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick Semantic Kernel if
Pick Semantic Kernel if semantic Kernel earns its complexity in enterprise environments with Azure OpenAI, .NET backends, and existing Microsoft infrastructure. But the core agent pattern — LLM call, tool dispatch, loop — is identical to what you can build in 60 lines of Python. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; LangGraph will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
LangGraph
18.9k
3.4k
Python
MIT
2024-01-17
LangChain Inc (Harrison Chase)
Sequoia Capital, Benchmark
Part of LangChain Inc — $50M raised across A and B
8.2M
LangGraph Platform (hosted), LangSmith (observability)
Yes
Used by: Replit, Klarna, Elastic
github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph→Semantic Kernel
27.6k
4.5k
C#
MIT
2023-02-27
Microsoft
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | LangGraph | Semantic Kernel |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | A `StateGraph` with nodes, edges, and a typed `State` channel | `ChatCompletionAgent` with `Kernel`, instructions, and service config |
| Tools | `ToolNode(tools)` paired with a conditional edge for routing | — |
| Loop | `add_conditional_edges` from a node back to itself until a `END` condition | — |
| State | Typed `State` channels with reducers (`Annotated[list, add_messages]`) | — |
| Checkpointing | `MemorySaver` / `PostgresSaver` persists state per `thread_id` | — |
| Human-in-loop | `interrupt_before` / `interrupt_after` pauses execution for review | — |
| Parallel fanout | Multiple edges from one node + reducers merge results | — |
| Tools / Plugins | — | `KernelPlugin` with `@kernel_function` decorators, typed parameters |
| Planning | — | `StepwisePlanner`, `HandlebarsPlanner` for multi-step decomposition |
| Memory | — | `SemanticTextMemory` with embeddings and vector stores |
| Orchestration | — | `Kernel.invoke()` with plugin resolution and filter pipeline |
| Multi-Language | — | C#, Python, Java SDKs with shared abstractions |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both LangGraph and Semantic Kernel implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →