Comparisons / LangGraph vs Smolagents
LangGraph vs Smolagents: Which Agent Framework to Use?
LangGraph vs Smolagents, head to head
LangGraph and Smolagents both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
LangGraph is LangChain's stateful workflow framework — a graph of nodes (functions) connected by edges with shared state.
Smolagents is HuggingFace's minimalist agent library.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick LangGraph if
Pick LangGraph if langGraph earns its weight when your agent is a workflow — explicit branches, checkpoints, parallel branches, or a human approval gate. For a single-agent loop, the graph machinery is overkill and a plain while loop is faster to write, debug, and ship. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Smolagents will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick Smolagents if
Pick Smolagents if smolagents lives up to its name — it's genuinely minimal and the code-agent approach is a real innovation that reduces LLM calls by ~30%. If you want a lightweight agent library with HuggingFace ecosystem access, it's excellent. For understanding the fundamentals, the plain version is even simpler. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; LangGraph will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
LangGraph
18.9k
3.4k
Python
MIT
2024-01-17
LangChain Inc (Harrison Chase)
Sequoia Capital, Benchmark
Part of LangChain Inc — $50M raised across A and B
8.2M
LangGraph Platform (hosted), LangSmith (observability)
Yes
Used by: Replit, Klarna, Elastic
github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph→Smolagents
26.4k
2.4k
Python
Apache-2.0
2024-12-05
Hugging Face
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | LangGraph | Smolagents |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | A `StateGraph` with nodes, edges, and a typed `State` channel | `CodeAgent` or `ToolCallingAgent` with model and tools list |
| Tools | `ToolNode(tools)` paired with a conditional edge for routing | `@tool` decorator or `Tool` class with name, description, and callable |
| Loop | `add_conditional_edges` from a node back to itself until a `END` condition | — |
| State | Typed `State` channels with reducers (`Annotated[list, add_messages]`) | — |
| Checkpointing | `MemorySaver` / `PostgresSaver` persists state per `thread_id` | — |
| Human-in-loop | `interrupt_before` / `interrupt_after` pauses execution for review | — |
| Parallel fanout | Multiple edges from one node + reducers merge results | — |
| Code Actions | — | `CodeAgent` writes Python code as its action, executed in sandbox |
| Sandbox | — | E2B, Docker, Modal, or Pyodide sandbox for safe code execution |
| Agent Loop | — | Internal loop: think (LLM reasons), act (code/tool call), observe (result) |
| Model Support | — | HuggingFace Hub models, OpenAI, Anthropic, local via LiteLLM |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both LangGraph and Smolagents implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →