Comparisons / LlamaIndex vs Mastra
LlamaIndex vs Mastra: Which Agent Framework to Use?
LlamaIndex vs Mastra, head to head
LlamaIndex and Mastra both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
LlamaIndex started as a RAG framework — connect your data, query it with an LLM.
Mastra is a TypeScript-first framework for building AI agents, from the team behind Gatsby.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick LlamaIndex if
Pick LlamaIndex if llamaIndex adds genuine value when your agent needs to query structured or unstructured data as part of its reasoning — that's the index-as-tool pattern, and it's well-executed. But if you're building a general-purpose agent that doesn't need RAG, the agent framework is overhead. The plain Python version of the agent loop is the same 60 lines either way. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Mastra will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick Mastra if
Pick Mastra if mastra is the best option for TypeScript teams that want a batteries-included agent framework without leaving the Node.js ecosystem. The workflow engine and Studio are genuinely productive. For simple agents or Python teams, the plain approach avoids an unnecessary dependency. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; LlamaIndex will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
LlamaIndex
48.3k
7.2k
Python
MIT
2022-11-02
Jerry Liu
Mastra
22.7k
1.8k
TypeScript
Apache-2.0
2024-08-06
Mastra AI
Spark Capital, Y Combinator
Series A ($22M, Apr 2026 — $35M total)
244.0k
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | LlamaIndex | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | `AgentRunner` with `AgentWorker`, or `ReActAgent` for tool-calling agents | `new Agent({ model, instructions, tools })` with automatic tool dispatch |
| Tools | `FunctionTool` for custom tools, `QueryEngineTool` to query an index as a tool | `createTool({ name, schema, execute })` with Zod validation |
| Agent Loop | `AgentRunner.chat()` manages step-by-step execution via `AgentWorker` tasks | — |
| RAG Integration | `VectorStoreIndex` + `QueryEngineTool` — the agent can query your data as a tool call | — |
| Memory | `ChatMemoryBuffer` with token limit, or custom memory modules | Short-term thread memory + long-term vector memory across sessions |
| Orchestration | `AgentRunner` step API for custom control flow, or multi-agent pipelines | — |
| Workflows | — | `Workflow` class with `.step()`, `.then()`, `.branch()` for orchestration |
| RAG | — | Built-in document syncing, chunking, embedding, and vector search |
| Studio | — | Mastra Studio: local GUI for testing agents, viewing traces, debugging |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both LlamaIndex and Mastra implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →