Comparisons / LlamaIndex vs OpenAI Agents SDK
LlamaIndex vs OpenAI Agents SDK: Which Agent Framework to Use?
LlamaIndex vs OpenAI Agents SDK, head to head
LlamaIndex and OpenAI Agents SDK both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
LlamaIndex started as a RAG framework — connect your data, query it with an LLM.
OpenAI's Agents SDK (evolved from Swarm) provides Agent, Runner, handoffs, and guardrails.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick LlamaIndex if
Pick LlamaIndex if llamaIndex adds genuine value when your agent needs to query structured or unstructured data as part of its reasoning — that's the index-as-tool pattern, and it's well-executed. But if you're building a general-purpose agent that doesn't need RAG, the agent framework is overhead. The plain Python version of the agent loop is the same 60 lines either way. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; OpenAI Agents SDK will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick OpenAI Agents SDK if
Pick OpenAI Agents SDK if the Agents SDK is the thinnest framework on this list — it barely abstracts beyond what you'd write yourself. Use it when you want OpenAI's conventions and auto-schema generation. Skip it when you want full control or use non-OpenAI models. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; LlamaIndex will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
LlamaIndex
48.3k
7.2k
Python
MIT
2022-11-02
Jerry Liu
OpenAI Agents SDK
20.6k
3.4k
Python
MIT
2025-03-11
OpenAI
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | LlamaIndex | OpenAI Agents SDK |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | `AgentRunner` with `AgentWorker`, or `ReActAgent` for tool-calling agents | `Agent(name, instructions, model, tools)` |
| Tools | `FunctionTool` for custom tools, `QueryEngineTool` to query an index as a tool | Python functions with type hints, auto-converted to schemas |
| Agent Loop | `AgentRunner.chat()` manages step-by-step execution via `AgentWorker` tasks | `Runner.run()` handles the loop internally |
| RAG Integration | `VectorStoreIndex` + `QueryEngineTool` — the agent can query your data as a tool call | — |
| Memory | `ChatMemoryBuffer` with token limit, or custom memory modules | — |
| Orchestration | `AgentRunner` step API for custom control flow, or multi-agent pipelines | — |
| Handoffs | — | `Handoff` between `Agent` objects for multi-agent routing |
| Guardrails | — | `InputGuardrail` and `OutputGuardrail` with tripwire pattern |
| Context | — | Typed context object passed through the agent lifecycle |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both LlamaIndex and OpenAI Agents SDK implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →