Comparisons / LlamaIndex vs Semantic Kernel

LlamaIndex vs Semantic Kernel: Which Agent Framework to Use?

LlamaIndex vs Semantic Kernel, head to head

LlamaIndex and Semantic Kernel both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.

LlamaIndex started as a RAG framework — connect your data, query it with an LLM.

Semantic Kernel is Microsoft's enterprise SDK for building AI agents.

Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.

Pick LlamaIndex if

Pick LlamaIndex if llamaIndex adds genuine value when your agent needs to query structured or unstructured data as part of its reasoning — that's the index-as-tool pattern, and it's well-executed. But if you're building a general-purpose agent that doesn't need RAG, the agent framework is overhead. The plain Python version of the agent loop is the same 60 lines either way. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Semantic Kernel will feel like translation if they don't.

Full LlamaIndexcomparison →

Pick Semantic Kernel if

Pick Semantic Kernel if semantic Kernel earns its complexity in enterprise environments with Azure OpenAI, .NET backends, and existing Microsoft infrastructure. But the core agent pattern — LLM call, tool dispatch, loop — is identical to what you can build in 60 lines of Python. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; LlamaIndex will feel like translation if they don't.

Full Semantic Kernelcomparison →

What both add

Whichever you pick, you're inheriting a dependency tree and a vocabulary your team has to learn before they ship anything. LlamaIndex has its own class hierarchy and tool registration conventions; Semantic Kernel has its. Either way, when something misbehaves you'll be reading framework source before you reach the actual HTTP call.

If the real workload is one model and a handful of tools, both can feel like a workbench for driving a nail. The lesson below builds the same pattern in plain Python — useful as a comparison point even if you ultimately keep the framework.

By the numbers

By the numbers

LlamaIndex

GitHub Stars

48.3k

Forks

7.2k

Language

Python

License

MIT

Created

2022-11-02

Created by

Jerry Liu

github.com/run-llama/llama_index

Semantic Kernel

GitHub Stars

27.6k

Forks

4.5k

Language

C#

License

MIT

Created

2023-02-27

Created by

Microsoft

github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel

GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.

ConceptLlamaIndexSemantic Kernel
Agent`AgentRunner` with `AgentWorker`, or `ReActAgent` for tool-calling agents`ChatCompletionAgent` with `Kernel`, instructions, and service config
Tools`FunctionTool` for custom tools, `QueryEngineTool` to query an index as a tool
Agent Loop`AgentRunner.chat()` manages step-by-step execution via `AgentWorker` tasks
RAG Integration`VectorStoreIndex` + `QueryEngineTool` — the agent can query your data as a tool call
Memory`ChatMemoryBuffer` with token limit, or custom memory modules`SemanticTextMemory` with embeddings and vector stores
Orchestration`AgentRunner` step API for custom control flow, or multi-agent pipelines`Kernel.invoke()` with plugin resolution and filter pipeline
Tools / Plugins`KernelPlugin` with `@kernel_function` decorators, typed parameters
Planning`StepwisePlanner`, `HandlebarsPlanner` for multi-step decomposition
Multi-LanguageC#, Python, Java SDKs with shared abstractions

Or build your own in 60 lines

Both LlamaIndex and Semantic Kernel implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.

No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.

Build it from scratch →