Comparisons / LlamaIndex vs Semantic Kernel
LlamaIndex vs Semantic Kernel: Which Agent Framework to Use?
LlamaIndex started as a RAG framework — connect your data, query it with an LLM. Semantic Kernel is Microsoft's enterprise SDK for building AI agents. Here is how they compare — paradigm, ecosystem, and the use cases each one is actually built for.
By the numbers
LlamaIndex
48.3k
7.2k
Python
MIT
2022-11-02
Jerry Liu
Semantic Kernel
27.6k
4.5k
C#
MIT
2023-02-27
Microsoft
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | LlamaIndex | Semantic Kernel |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | `AgentRunner` with `AgentWorker`, or `ReActAgent` for tool-calling agents | `ChatCompletionAgent` with `Kernel`, instructions, and service config |
| Tools | `FunctionTool` for custom tools, `QueryEngineTool` to query an index as a tool | — |
| Agent Loop | `AgentRunner.chat()` manages step-by-step execution via `AgentWorker` tasks | — |
| RAG Integration | `VectorStoreIndex` + `QueryEngineTool` — the agent can query your data as a tool call | — |
| Memory | `ChatMemoryBuffer` with token limit, or custom memory modules | `SemanticTextMemory` with embeddings and vector stores |
| Orchestration | `AgentRunner` step API for custom control flow, or multi-agent pipelines | `Kernel.invoke()` with plugin resolution and filter pipeline |
| Tools / Plugins | — | `KernelPlugin` with `@kernel_function` decorators, typed parameters |
| Planning | — | `StepwisePlanner`, `HandlebarsPlanner` for multi-step decomposition |
| Multi-Language | — | C#, Python, Java SDKs with shared abstractions |
LlamaIndex vs Semantic Kernel, head to head
LlamaIndex LlamaIndex started as a RAG framework — connect your data, query it with an LLM.
Semantic Kernel Semantic Kernel is Microsoft's enterprise SDK for building AI agents.
Both wrap the same underlying agent pattern — an LLM call, a tool dispatch, a loop — in different abstractions. The choice between them is mostly about which mental model and ecosystem fits the team you have, not which one is technically more capable.
Pick LlamaIndex if
Pick LlamaIndex if llamaIndex adds genuine value when your agent needs to query structured or unstructured data as part of its reasoning — that's the index-as-tool pattern, and it's well-executed. But if you're building a general-purpose agent that doesn't need RAG, the agent framework is overhead. The plain Python version of the agent loop is the same 60 lines either way. LlamaIndex is the right fit when the tradeoffs in its intro line up with how your team actually wants to work day-to-day; Semantic Kernel would force you to translate.
Pick Semantic Kernel if
Pick Semantic Kernel if semantic Kernel earns its complexity in enterprise environments with Azure OpenAI, .NET backends, and existing Microsoft infrastructure. But the core agent pattern — LLM call, tool dispatch, loop — is identical to what you can build in 60 lines of Python. Semantic Kernel is the right fit when the tradeoffs in its intro line up with how your team actually wants to work day-to-day; LlamaIndex would force you to translate.
What both add
Both LlamaIndex and Semantic Kernel pull in a class hierarchy and a dependency tree to wrap what is, at the core, an HTTP POST in a while loop. If your use case is straightforward — one provider, a handful of tools, a single agent — the framework cost may exceed the framework benefit. The lesson below shows the same pattern in ~60 lines without either dependency.
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both LlamaIndex and Semantic Kernel implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →