Comparisons / OpenAI Agents SDK vs Pydantic AI
OpenAI Agents SDK vs Pydantic AI: Which Agent Framework to Use?
OpenAI Agents SDK vs Pydantic AI, head to head
OpenAI Agents SDK and Pydantic AI both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
OpenAI's Agents SDK (evolved from Swarm) provides Agent, Runner, handoffs, and guardrails.
Pydantic AI is a type-safe agent framework built by the Pydantic team.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick OpenAI Agents SDK if
Pick OpenAI Agents SDK if the Agents SDK is the thinnest framework on this list — it barely abstracts beyond what you'd write yourself. Use it when you want OpenAI's conventions and auto-schema generation. Skip it when you want full control or use non-OpenAI models. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Pydantic AI will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick Pydantic AI if
Pick Pydantic AI if pydantic AI adds genuine value if you want compile-time type checking across your agent's tools, outputs, and dependencies. If you already use Pydantic in your stack, it fits naturally. But the core agent logic — loop, dispatch, validate — is still ~60 lines of Python you can own entirely. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; OpenAI Agents SDK will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
OpenAI Agents SDK
20.6k
3.4k
Python
MIT
2025-03-11
OpenAI
Pydantic AI
16.1k
1.9k
Python
MIT
2024-06-21
Pydantic (Samuel Colvin)
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | OpenAI Agents SDK | Pydantic AI |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | `Agent(name, instructions, model, tools)` | `Agent()` class with typed `result_type`, system prompt, and `model` parameter |
| Tools | Python functions with type hints, auto-converted to schemas | `@agent.tool` decorator with typed parameters and Pydantic validation |
| Agent Loop | `Runner.run()` handles the loop internally | `agent.run()` handles the tool-call loop internally with typed dispatch |
| Handoffs | `Handoff` between `Agent` objects for multi-agent routing | — |
| Guardrails | `InputGuardrail` and `OutputGuardrail` with tripwire pattern | — |
| Context | Typed context object passed through the agent lifecycle | — |
| Structured Output | — | `result_type=MyModel` enforces Pydantic model on final LLM response |
| Model Switching | — | Swap `model='openai:gpt-4o'` to `model='anthropic:claude-sonnet'` in one line |
| Dependencies | — | `RunContext[DepsType]` injects typed dependencies into tools at runtime |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both OpenAI Agents SDK and Pydantic AI implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →