Comparisons / OpenAI Agents SDK vs Semantic Kernel

OpenAI Agents SDK vs Semantic Kernel: Which Agent Framework to Use?

OpenAI Agents SDK vs Semantic Kernel, head to head

OpenAI Agents SDK and Semantic Kernel both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.

OpenAI's Agents SDK (evolved from Swarm) provides Agent, Runner, handoffs, and guardrails.

Semantic Kernel is Microsoft's enterprise SDK for building AI agents.

Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.

Pick OpenAI Agents SDK if

Pick OpenAI Agents SDK if the Agents SDK is the thinnest framework on this list — it barely abstracts beyond what you'd write yourself. Use it when you want OpenAI's conventions and auto-schema generation. Skip it when you want full control or use non-OpenAI models. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Semantic Kernel will feel like translation if they don't.

Full OpenAI Agents SDKcomparison →

Pick Semantic Kernel if

Pick Semantic Kernel if semantic Kernel earns its complexity in enterprise environments with Azure OpenAI, .NET backends, and existing Microsoft infrastructure. But the core agent pattern — LLM call, tool dispatch, loop — is identical to what you can build in 60 lines of Python. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; OpenAI Agents SDK will feel like translation if they don't.

Full Semantic Kernelcomparison →

What both add

Whichever you pick, you're inheriting a dependency tree and a vocabulary your team has to learn before they ship anything. OpenAI Agents SDK has its own class hierarchy and tool registration conventions; Semantic Kernel has its. Either way, when something misbehaves you'll be reading framework source before you reach the actual HTTP call.

If the real workload is one model and a handful of tools, both can feel like a workbench for driving a nail. The lesson below builds the same pattern in plain Python — useful as a comparison point even if you ultimately keep the framework.

By the numbers

By the numbers

OpenAI Agents SDK

GitHub Stars

20.6k

Forks

3.4k

Language

Python

License

MIT

Created

2025-03-11

Created by

OpenAI

github.com/openai/openai-agents-python

Semantic Kernel

GitHub Stars

27.6k

Forks

4.5k

Language

C#

License

MIT

Created

2023-02-27

Created by

Microsoft

github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel

GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.

ConceptOpenAI Agents SDKSemantic Kernel
Agent`Agent(name, instructions, model, tools)``ChatCompletionAgent` with `Kernel`, instructions, and service config
ToolsPython functions with type hints, auto-converted to schemas
Agent Loop`Runner.run()` handles the loop internally
Handoffs`Handoff` between `Agent` objects for multi-agent routing
Guardrails`InputGuardrail` and `OutputGuardrail` with tripwire pattern
ContextTyped context object passed through the agent lifecycle
Tools / Plugins`KernelPlugin` with `@kernel_function` decorators, typed parameters
Planning`StepwisePlanner`, `HandlebarsPlanner` for multi-step decomposition
Memory`SemanticTextMemory` with embeddings and vector stores
Orchestration`Kernel.invoke()` with plugin resolution and filter pipeline
Multi-LanguageC#, Python, Java SDKs with shared abstractions

Or build your own in 60 lines

Both OpenAI Agents SDK and Semantic Kernel implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.

No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.

Build it from scratch →