Comparisons / OpenAI Agents SDK vs Semantic Kernel
OpenAI Agents SDK vs Semantic Kernel: Which Agent Framework to Use?
OpenAI Agents SDK vs Semantic Kernel, head to head
OpenAI Agents SDK and Semantic Kernel both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
OpenAI's Agents SDK (evolved from Swarm) provides Agent, Runner, handoffs, and guardrails.
Semantic Kernel is Microsoft's enterprise SDK for building AI agents.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick OpenAI Agents SDK if
Pick OpenAI Agents SDK if the Agents SDK is the thinnest framework on this list — it barely abstracts beyond what you'd write yourself. Use it when you want OpenAI's conventions and auto-schema generation. Skip it when you want full control or use non-OpenAI models. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Semantic Kernel will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick Semantic Kernel if
Pick Semantic Kernel if semantic Kernel earns its complexity in enterprise environments with Azure OpenAI, .NET backends, and existing Microsoft infrastructure. But the core agent pattern — LLM call, tool dispatch, loop — is identical to what you can build in 60 lines of Python. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; OpenAI Agents SDK will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
OpenAI Agents SDK
20.6k
3.4k
Python
MIT
2025-03-11
OpenAI
Semantic Kernel
27.6k
4.5k
C#
MIT
2023-02-27
Microsoft
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | OpenAI Agents SDK | Semantic Kernel |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | `Agent(name, instructions, model, tools)` | `ChatCompletionAgent` with `Kernel`, instructions, and service config |
| Tools | Python functions with type hints, auto-converted to schemas | — |
| Agent Loop | `Runner.run()` handles the loop internally | — |
| Handoffs | `Handoff` between `Agent` objects for multi-agent routing | — |
| Guardrails | `InputGuardrail` and `OutputGuardrail` with tripwire pattern | — |
| Context | Typed context object passed through the agent lifecycle | — |
| Tools / Plugins | — | `KernelPlugin` with `@kernel_function` decorators, typed parameters |
| Planning | — | `StepwisePlanner`, `HandlebarsPlanner` for multi-step decomposition |
| Memory | — | `SemanticTextMemory` with embeddings and vector stores |
| Orchestration | — | `Kernel.invoke()` with plugin resolution and filter pipeline |
| Multi-Language | — | C#, Python, Java SDKs with shared abstractions |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both OpenAI Agents SDK and Semantic Kernel implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →