Comparisons / OpenAI Agents SDK vs Smolagents
OpenAI Agents SDK vs Smolagents: Which Agent Framework to Use?
OpenAI Agents SDK vs Smolagents, head to head
OpenAI Agents SDK and Smolagents both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
OpenAI's Agents SDK (evolved from Swarm) provides Agent, Runner, handoffs, and guardrails.
Smolagents is HuggingFace's minimalist agent library.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick OpenAI Agents SDK if
Pick OpenAI Agents SDK if the Agents SDK is the thinnest framework on this list — it barely abstracts beyond what you'd write yourself. Use it when you want OpenAI's conventions and auto-schema generation. Skip it when you want full control or use non-OpenAI models. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Smolagents will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick Smolagents if
Pick Smolagents if smolagents lives up to its name — it's genuinely minimal and the code-agent approach is a real innovation that reduces LLM calls by ~30%. If you want a lightweight agent library with HuggingFace ecosystem access, it's excellent. For understanding the fundamentals, the plain version is even simpler. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; OpenAI Agents SDK will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
OpenAI Agents SDK
20.6k
3.4k
Python
MIT
2025-03-11
OpenAI
Smolagents
26.4k
2.4k
Python
Apache-2.0
2024-12-05
Hugging Face
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | OpenAI Agents SDK | Smolagents |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | `Agent(name, instructions, model, tools)` | `CodeAgent` or `ToolCallingAgent` with model and tools list |
| Tools | Python functions with type hints, auto-converted to schemas | `@tool` decorator or `Tool` class with name, description, and callable |
| Agent Loop | `Runner.run()` handles the loop internally | Internal loop: think (LLM reasons), act (code/tool call), observe (result) |
| Handoffs | `Handoff` between `Agent` objects for multi-agent routing | — |
| Guardrails | `InputGuardrail` and `OutputGuardrail` with tripwire pattern | — |
| Context | Typed context object passed through the agent lifecycle | — |
| Code Actions | — | `CodeAgent` writes Python code as its action, executed in sandbox |
| Sandbox | — | E2B, Docker, Modal, or Pyodide sandbox for safe code execution |
| Model Support | — | HuggingFace Hub models, OpenAI, Anthropic, local via LiteLLM |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both OpenAI Agents SDK and Smolagents implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →