Comparisons / Pydantic AI vs Semantic Kernel
Pydantic AI vs Semantic Kernel: Which Agent Framework to Use?
Pydantic AI vs Semantic Kernel, head to head
Pydantic AI and Semantic Kernel both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
Pydantic AI is a type-safe agent framework built by the Pydantic team.
Semantic Kernel is Microsoft's enterprise SDK for building AI agents.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick Pydantic AI if
Pick Pydantic AI if pydantic AI adds genuine value if you want compile-time type checking across your agent's tools, outputs, and dependencies. If you already use Pydantic in your stack, it fits naturally. But the core agent logic — loop, dispatch, validate — is still ~60 lines of Python you can own entirely. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Semantic Kernel will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick Semantic Kernel if
Pick Semantic Kernel if semantic Kernel earns its complexity in enterprise environments with Azure OpenAI, .NET backends, and existing Microsoft infrastructure. But the core agent pattern — LLM call, tool dispatch, loop — is identical to what you can build in 60 lines of Python. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Pydantic AI will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
Pydantic AI
16.1k
1.9k
Python
MIT
2024-06-21
Pydantic (Samuel Colvin)
Semantic Kernel
27.6k
4.5k
C#
MIT
2023-02-27
Microsoft
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | Pydantic AI | Semantic Kernel |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | `Agent()` class with typed `result_type`, system prompt, and `model` parameter | `ChatCompletionAgent` with `Kernel`, instructions, and service config |
| Tools | `@agent.tool` decorator with typed parameters and Pydantic validation | — |
| Agent Loop | `agent.run()` handles the tool-call loop internally with typed dispatch | — |
| Structured Output | `result_type=MyModel` enforces Pydantic model on final LLM response | — |
| Model Switching | Swap `model='openai:gpt-4o'` to `model='anthropic:claude-sonnet'` in one line | — |
| Dependencies | `RunContext[DepsType]` injects typed dependencies into tools at runtime | — |
| Tools / Plugins | — | `KernelPlugin` with `@kernel_function` decorators, typed parameters |
| Planning | — | `StepwisePlanner`, `HandlebarsPlanner` for multi-step decomposition |
| Memory | — | `SemanticTextMemory` with embeddings and vector stores |
| Orchestration | — | `Kernel.invoke()` with plugin resolution and filter pipeline |
| Multi-Language | — | C#, Python, Java SDKs with shared abstractions |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both Pydantic AI and Semantic Kernel implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →