Comparisons / Pydantic AI vs Smolagents
Pydantic AI vs Smolagents: Which Agent Framework to Use?
Pydantic AI vs Smolagents, head to head
Pydantic AI and Smolagents both let you build an agent, but they sit in different parts of the stack and they assume different things about who's writing the code.
Pydantic AI is a type-safe agent framework built by the Pydantic team.
Smolagents is HuggingFace's minimalist agent library.
Underneath, both wrap the same thing: a model call, a tool dispatch, a loop. The decision is about which abstraction your team wants to think in day to day, and which ecosystem you're willing to inherit along with it. There's an honest, framework-free version of the same pattern in about 60 lines of Python in the lesson at the bottom of this page — useful as a baseline regardless of which framework wins.
Pick Pydantic AI if
Pick Pydantic AI if pydantic AI adds genuine value if you want compile-time type checking across your agent's tools, outputs, and dependencies. If you already use Pydantic in your stack, it fits naturally. But the core agent logic — loop, dispatch, validate — is still ~60 lines of Python you can own entirely. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Smolagents will feel like translation if they don't.
Pick Smolagents if
Pick Smolagents if smolagents lives up to its name — it's genuinely minimal and the code-agent approach is a real innovation that reduces LLM calls by ~30%. If you want a lightweight agent library with HuggingFace ecosystem access, it's excellent. For understanding the fundamentals, the plain version is even simpler. The tradeoffs in its intro should match how your team already thinks about agents; Pydantic AI will feel like translation if they don't.
By the numbers
By the numbers
Pydantic AI
16.1k
1.9k
Python
MIT
2024-06-21
Pydantic (Samuel Colvin)
Smolagents
26.4k
2.4k
Python
Apache-2.0
2024-12-05
Hugging Face
GitHub stats as of April 2026. Stars indicate community interest, not necessarily quality or fit for your use case.
| Concept | Pydantic AI | Smolagents |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | `Agent()` class with typed `result_type`, system prompt, and `model` parameter | `CodeAgent` or `ToolCallingAgent` with model and tools list |
| Tools | `@agent.tool` decorator with typed parameters and Pydantic validation | `@tool` decorator or `Tool` class with name, description, and callable |
| Agent Loop | `agent.run()` handles the tool-call loop internally with typed dispatch | Internal loop: think (LLM reasons), act (code/tool call), observe (result) |
| Structured Output | `result_type=MyModel` enforces Pydantic model on final LLM response | — |
| Model Switching | Swap `model='openai:gpt-4o'` to `model='anthropic:claude-sonnet'` in one line | — |
| Dependencies | `RunContext[DepsType]` injects typed dependencies into tools at runtime | — |
| Code Actions | — | `CodeAgent` writes Python code as its action, executed in sandbox |
| Sandbox | — | E2B, Docker, Modal, or Pyodide sandbox for safe code execution |
| Model Support | — | HuggingFace Hub models, OpenAI, Anthropic, local via LiteLLM |
Or build your own in 60 lines
Both Pydantic AI and Smolagents implement the same 8 patterns. An agent is a function. Tools are a dict. The loop is a while loop. The whole thing composes in ~60 lines of Python.
No framework. No dependencies. No opinions. Just the code.
Build it from scratch →